Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Lunatics in charge of the asylum - Plotting my escape:

One of the things that used to drive me mad during my corrupt and unlawful detention in the maximum security lunatic asylum was the way the morning shift would arrive, unlock our spartan cells, give us our breakfast, and say to me "So, what are you going to do today Kate?"  (The other one was "Oh - look at the rabbits!" - outside the window, playing on the grass, this attempt to initiate conversation soon became very boring indeed, but I soon learned you had to be very careful indeed what you said, and it was good as a general rule to say as little as possible.)


It drove me mad because there WAS nothing to do in there, apart from read a few dog eared English Woman's Weekly's from about ten years ago, and stare into space.  Or risk conversing with the other 'patients' . . . many of whom had been sentenced to long periods of imprisonment for murder or manslaughter (and that's only what they were sent to jail for - some of them did unspeakable things in jail to warrant being sent to the Rangipapa lunatic asylum), but the majority of the other ladies there were really nice to me.  If it wasn't for them, and the people who worked so hard to get me out, like Jenny Evans, Gail Penney, Mrs Goodall, Tony Pearce, Benjamin Easton and Maria Van Der Meel, Liz Lambert, Stephen Cotterell, Areta Chapman, and others, the outcome could have easily been very different.

Many of the other 'patients' were incredibly nice and kind to me, especially the other ladies, HK, Jackie, Katrina and Terri, and despite the conditions being totally surreal and often like something out of One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest with the barbarity of the forced medication and the history of the other 'patients' and the subject under discussion at any given time about this (confidential) history, we often had a lot of fun - much to the annoyance of the 'doctors' and some of the 'nurses'.  These ladies are lovely, I had nothing but the clothes I stood up in and a couple of pieces of paper with me when I was 'arrested' and brought to Rangipapa Unit, and the papers had been taken off me - and the clothes for a while, new 'patients' and ones who have been very naughty, are made to wear horrible denim 'gowns'.  Staff issued me with a toothbrush and a tube of toothpaste, tiny bar of soap, and a tiny bottle of shampoo.  If you wanted to have a bath you had to ask at the office for the plug, and return it when you finished.  Baths were a luxury and a privilege, I learned.

Despite the explicit instructions of my so called 'Responsible Clinicians' - corrupt psychos Jacqueline 'Jackie' Short and Brenda Sally Rimkeit and others, I managed to get my hands on a pen and paper while locked in the high security loony bin with at least two staff watching each 'patient' every waking hour.

I soon made good use of them, and mindful of the words of others who've walked all over me in the past ("Well Nicci I suppose as Finola said, we weren't ever going to write the perfect script. Just one step at a time to shut down as many avenues as possible.  In terms of the animal ethics issue, if you and Hugh feel there is any legal risk if she were to take up an issue, I would move to deal with it, otherwise just ignore it again."), bearing the MAF emails in mind, I rather wisely decided to take up the issue legally.

I managed to get my hands on the Guidelines to the Mental Health Act (link will be added shortly) for about half an hour once, which clearly state that it is unlawful to assume someone has a mental illness just because they disagree with people from an official organisation or on the basis of their political views and several senior lawyers have made written allegations with attached EVIDENCE that the NZ Police have been conducting a corrupt campaign of harassment and malicious and vexatious prosecutions against me.

This was also confirmed by Dr Justin Barry-Walsh in the psychiatric report he wrote regarding me - the first one done, but corruptly rejected by the Court. 

One of the honourable members of staff, with integrity, faxed these two handwritten documents to the High Court at Wellington on the 19th and 20th of February:

To Fax: (04) 914 3603            URGENT            19 April 2011
From Fax: (04) 918 2562 Rangipapa Unit, Porirua Hospital

To the High Court at Wellington:

May it please the Court:

I, Katherine Raue, wish to make an urgent application under section 84(2) and  section 84(3) of the Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992 to be brought before a Judge for examination and on the evidence of other witnesses, for the purpose of a Judicial Inquiry to establish that I am fit to be discharged from the hospital, (section 84(3)(b)).

I respectfully request that the Court consider such evidence as the attached affidavit from Witness X, and other documents, including several psychiatric reports and letters from lawyers relevant to this matter, and the evidence of several witnesses, including Witness X.

Judge DRW Barry of the District Court has already acknowledged that there are serious factual inaccuracies in at least one of the recent reports prepared for the Court.  At a recent fixture in the Masterton Court Judge Barry acknowledged that reference to " a previous pattern" of involvement with police when she lived in Wellington" (report of Dr Justin Barry-Walsh, November 2009, and attributed to Constable Peter Cunningham) was erroneous and significantly misleading in that I had not lived in Wellington for about thirty years, and had had next to nothing to do with Police all my life until having the misfortune to come to Carterton in 1999 and meet Constable Cunningham, who told Dr Barry-Walsh (and anyone else who will listen) this orchestrated litany of lies.

Judge Barry also acknowledged evidence from a number of lawyers which included a letter from one which stated that it was "obvious that you have been a lightning rod for Police attention since you arrived in the Wairarapa, and that has resulted in many unnecessary charges being laid and this was most unfair to you."  The writer (senior lawyer Ken Daniels) was pleased at the dismissal of a number of charges against me and that it was obvious that there had been no evidence to support them from the outset and they should not have been laid.  Other letters from lawyers also comment strongly on the refusal of Police take statements or formal complaints from me on a large number of valid matters including several matters directly relevant to the current charges against me.  Police themselves have admitted repeatedly refusing to take complaints when questioned about it in Court.

I also wish to respectfully request a review or Judicial Inquiry or an Appeal of the recent decision of District Court Judge B Davidson's finding under Section 9 of the Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003.  With respect to Judge Davidson, it is perfectly clear that there is NOT sufficient evidence, on the balance of probabilities, to establish that I caused the act that forms the basis of the offence with which I am charged.  For your ease of reference I attach the witness statements, and transcript of the Depositions Hearing.

If I may draw your attention to the transcript of the Depositions Hearing, page 7 (also marked 12 in the upper right hand corner for some reason), refering to the numbers in the left hand margin, at (5) or thereabouts the principal Crown witness states that he "took no notice at the time" of what I was saying. 

At (15) or thereabouts he states that he has ADHD and forgets things (ADHD is a mental disorder as far as I understand it).

At (20) or thereabouts the witness is again asked what it is thatI am alleged to have said to him and his response is:  "She goes to me, she says - I don't know, it's gone."

And at (30) the witness agrees that he hasn't got a clue what I said to him basically. The matter should not have proceeded beyond Depositions let alone the Section 9 hearing!

Briefly, the background to this matter is that on 11th February 2009 I was attacked in my home by the Crown witness in the matter of the alleged Perverting the Course of Justice, Michael Francis Murphy, and others.  Police refused to even take a statement from me regarding this violent attack, let alone charge Mr Murphy.  The attack was in response to - or rather, a result of - Mr Murphy finding out that I had raised concerns of child abuse and violence involving him to the local police - another matter the Wairarapa police have refused to investigate.

Three totally independent witnesses to this attack on 11 February 2009 all rang emergency seriveces on 111 as they witnessed the violent attack as it was taking place, but despite this, Police refused to take a statement from me, or from two of the witnesses.  I then requested the audiotape of the 111 call made by one of the witnesses, and Police refused to provide it.  After complaining to the Ombudsmen I received a computer disk containing 46 Police radio tracks, including the call to 111 from the third witness, who I had been unaware of prior to receiving the disk, which also contained a number of other tracks which were potentially very embarrassing to the police as well as incriminating Mr Murphy. 

Shortly after Police became aware that I had this disk (about two months after the attack) I arrived home one day and caught Murphy stealing a satchel containing the disk and some documents.  I immediately rang police and made a signed statement to Constable Laura Rhymer, which was recorded in her notebook. 

If I may draw your attention to page 12 of transcript of the the Depositions hearing (17 in the top right hand corner) reference is made to a statement allegedly taken a couple of hours later, also by Constable Rhymer, from Crown witness Aaron Brook (who can't remember what it is I am alleged to have said to him because of his ADHD).

This statement was NOT recorded in Constable Rhymer's notebook - and nor was it included in the Disclosure to the defence (me).  I was unaware of its existence until that very moment, half way through Constable Rhymer's evidence at the Depositions hearing.

Page 12 paragraph (20) of Murphy's evidence alleges that he didn't go to my house since Christmas 2008 except for a couple of occasions "when we were friends" (page one of the transcript).  - I specifically asked the amicus curiae - ex police officer Bryan Yeoman - to question Murphy closely about the attack on 11 February 2009, but Yeoman refused to do so.

Dr Brenda Sally Rimkeit wrote a certificate to the Court stating that in her opinion I needed to be detained in a psychiatric institution to have assessments done to see if I am fit to stand trial.

Judge DRW Barry had accepted my explanation only a few weeks earlier that the only reason I had failed to attend two earlier appointments was because they had been made in Porirua when they should have been made in Masterton (as the one in November 2009, with Dr Barry-Walsh had been), and also, I had been unable to attend the appointments at Porirua because I had received one days notice in one case and three days in the other case, and that WINZ had refused to assist me with travel costs on the grounds that "Work and Income cannot be seen to assist clients who do not abide by the law."!

Surely this is a breach of the cornerstone of justice for centuries, that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty!  I was unable to attend Court in Wellington on 28 February 2011 for the same reason,and mistakenly thought my attendance had been excused on that day, pending the completion of the psychiatric reports. 

I explained this reason for my non attendance for the two recent appointments to Dr Rimkeit, but she refused to accept it (unlike Judge Barry) and the amicus refused to explain it to Judge Davidson, who didn't allow me to speak.

Dr Rimkeit's report to the District Court, dated 22 March 2011 states on page 9:  "My concern that (sic) if she proceeds to represent herself at Court she may, through her delusional belief system falsely accuse certain parties of wrongdoing."

Dr Rimkeit's belief is that I suffer from "Delusional Disorder."  Even if she was correct (I do not agree) this is not a major mental disorder, and I do not pose a danger to myself or anyone else.  Just because I hold the view that the Police - certain specific police officers, not all police I hasten to add, have not treated me fairly, does not necessarily mean that I am delusional.

Dr Rimkeit's report and others contain a large number of factual inaccuracies.  Just one example of this is the last paragraph of page 8 of her report, continued on page 9, where Dr Rimkeit goes on about the "headmaster of the local school in Carterton that she was fired from being paid off or bribed . . . " and something about a car.  I clearly stated to her an entirely factual account about receiving a letter from the Board of Trustees of the school, sacking me because, according to the letter, the Board had recently received information from the local Police that I had "recently been charged with an offence involving a child." 

I have never in my life been charged with any such offence!  The writers of the letter are delusional, not me!

Dr Rimkeit raised the proposition that the Principal's new car had anything to do with the matter, I merely said it was a coincidence, and only after she asked me if I thought he was bribed with the car.  She also mentions suicide in the third paragraph on that page - I have never EVER attempted or even intended to commit suicide, I have never planned or threatened to.  I have repeatedly requested that discussions between me and the psychiatrists are recorded by audio or video and these requests have been continually refused.

The reports appear to be an orchestrated litany of lies, bearing no resemblance to fact, almost every paragraph containing significant FACTUAL inaccuracies, as opposed to matters of opinion.

My main concern is that any subsequent reports will take the inaccurate reports into account and be therefore tainted.  My only involvement with mental health services previously was to request a referral from my GP to the "To Be Heard" program.  This program assists people who feel they aren't being listened to (by Police etc) as I was/am suffering from depression (moderate).

Upon admission to Rangipapa, and on the orders of Dr Rimkeit - my "responsible clinician" the four medications prescribed by my GP were abruptly ceased, causing serious side effects.

I am not psychotic, or delusional.  Witness X, my landlady, will give evidence that a rock larger than my head was thrown through the window of the "granny flat" I occupy at her address very recently.  I did not imagine this, or the attack on 11th February 2009.  I identified Michael Murphy at the time the rock was thrown, as did the three independent witnesses to the attack on 11 February 2009, and again Police have refused to charge him.  Crown witness Aaron Brook has stated repeatedly that he saw Murphy in the near vicinity when I cought him burgling my house in April 2009.

Aaron Brook's evidence is consistent in that regard, unlike his evidence against me.  Mr Brook came to my house and volunteered this information.  I did not ever suggest that he tell Police anything whatsoever apart from what he actually told me he witnessed.  His statements (witness statement, Depositions statement) and the Depositions transcript are very vague indeed about the crime I am alleged to have committed, saying that he "felt" I wanted him to lie.

I respectfully submit that Aaron Brook is more delusional than I am, or at best he is simply mistaken, or misunderstood what I said.

The section 9 Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003 matter was not properly addressed if it was addressed at all.  The amicus curiae told Judge Davidson that the Depositions hearing had established that the Court was satisfied of my involvement in the offence, but I respectfully submit that this was not the case and the amicus knows that perfectly well.

I am not a lawyer, but have developed an interest in the law and would like to continue legal studies (I passed introduction to law).  I am currently being detained in a secure mental facility, having not been convicted of an offence, and have been for over eight weeks.  I am not being permitted any incoming or outgoing phone calls or visits except from lawyers, and not permitted any incoming or outgoing mail I was told today.

For over two weeks I was detained in conditions that were frankly appalling - isolation, no excercise, sunlight, company or stimulus, although as I write this I am now  in the "main ward" again and conditions are improved slightly.

While in the seclusion ward I had very limited access to my property, including basic items such as pen and paper.  Pain in my hand and wrist makes writing difficult and I have no access to a computer, typewriter, etc.  I apologise for the length and disjointed nature of this letter, the main points (in summary) are:

1.    I do not suffer from any major mental disorder.

2.    I am not a danger to myself, or others.

3.`    The requested assessments could be completed if I were discharged from "hospital", and appointments scheduled in Masterton.

4.    I have been here over eight weeks, and there have been four or five reports completed in that time, some of which suggest that I have "Delusional Disorder" for thinking that some Police officers are not treating me fairly, there has not been any consideration given to the possibility that this belief may be valid

5.    I am being forcibly medicated with strong anti-psychotic medication, causing serious side effects.  There has been no formal cognitive test done to support the "diagnosis" and no "treatment" apart from the medication.

6.    I respectfully submit that I was fit to plead not guilty (as I did), I am fit to appear in Court, and fit to represent myself if necessary.  I attach a copy of the decision of Judge DRW Barry on the matter of an application by the Crown pursuant to Section 344A of the Crimes Act 1961, dated 30 September 2010.  I opposed the Crown's application and represented myself at the hearing of it.  The application was in relation to a related charge of Escaping From Custody.

Paragraph 19 of Judge Barry's decision explains that this charge was included in the indictment for allegedly Perverting the Course of Justice. 

During the course of the hearing the Crown made another application, under section 347 of the Crimes Act, that I be discharged of the offence (deemed to be an acquittal).  I managed to conduct myself appropriately, under difficult circumstances, and represent myself competently.  I prepared for the hearing as best I could, having only received the various precedent decisions less than a day before the hearing (at least one of these was handed to me after the hearing began, the first time I'd seen it) and I achieved the outcome I had planned to achieve.  There were no "emotional outbursts" as referred to in Dr Rimkeit's report, not did I speak "out of turn" at any stage or have to be rebuked by the Judge.  I was acquitted of the charge, after an application from the Crown to the Judge to do so under section 347.

7.    An urgent inquiry is required into the factual inaccuracies in the psychiatric reports written since I have been incarcerated and forcibly drugged and the factually incorrect information given by Constable Cunningham to Dr Barry-Walsh.  The Family Court has asked for yet another report now.  The problem is that subsequent reports take the "previous history" - and the previous reports - into account, and are, and will be, therefore tainted.  Another example of the factual inaccuracies is the claim on page 9 of Dr Rimkeit's report that I was abused as a young child.  This is simply not true.

I look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible.

(signed)
Katherine Raue
19 April 2011
_____________________________________________________________


To Fax: (04) 914 3603            URGENT            20 April 2011
From Fax: (04) 918 2562 Katherine Raue, Rangipapa Unit, Porirua Hospital

To the High Court at Wellington:


May it please the Court:
Further to my application for a Judicial Inquiry pursuant to section 84 of the Mental Health Act, dated 19 April 2011.

I am being prevented from contacting anyone, including Legal Services, the Court, the Police, etc, and staff are being extremely obstructive and not facilitating communication with lawyers.  Staff continually say "later", or simply disappear for hour after hour, day after day.

Lawyers assigned by legal aid are refusing to accept or carry out instructions.  Several such lawyers have been instructed to address the matter of the factual inaccuracies in the recent reports and to request a Judicial Inquiry into these matters, and simply refuse to do so, prefering to delay and drag out these proceedings in order to extract the maximum amount of legal aid that they can they  then inform me that the grant has been used up and for that reason they cannot continue to act.  One "forgot" to attend yesterday's hearing.

This is a gross miscarriage of justice.  I am the victim of crime - not the perpetrator!  I am not delusional in believing that certain police officers are not treating me fairly.  The failure and refusal of Wairarapa Police to investigate child abuse allegations has been well publicised recently.

I reported my concerns about Michael Murphy's violence (and that of his associates) to Police, who refused to acknowledge or investigate my allegations.  Police then disclosed my complaint to Murphy, who then came to my house with his associates and attacked me.  Police refused to charge him in spite of a mountain of evidence of the violent attack then corruptly charged me with Perverting the Course of Justice after Murphy broke into my house to steal the evidence of his violent attack.

Murphy recently threw a large rock through my window, Police refused to take a statement from me.  Staff at the facility where I am being held are refusing to allow me to contact Police, IPCA, family, friends, my bank, my landlady, the Court, etc.  The refusals amount to perverting the course of justice in themselves!

Documents which were in my possession at the time of my arrest on 4th March 2011 and others which were handed to me at the Masterton Police station have also disappeared including a copy of pages from Constable Rhymer's notbook and a Court Summons.  Staff at Rangipapa Unit gave me two fax forms and told me to write faxes to Masterton Police and Arohata Prison specifically about this missing property, which I did on 10th April, but then staff informed me that they had received instructions from Dr Rimkeit and Dr Short and that they were not to send the faxes!

The Unit Prison Liaison Officer, Chris Norris, told staff and me that Arohata Prison staff were saying I had never been at the Prison.  I was actually admitted there not just once, but twice - once on 5th March 2011, and a second admission was processed on the 7th March because the amicus curiae didn't turn up to Court that day and so I was remanded in custody until the following day.

The missing page of Constable Rhymer's notebook was found to be missing on the night on 7th March, I recorded this with a green highlighter given to me (loaned) by prison staff at Arohata.

The clear, heat sealed plastic property bag from Masterton Police station was shown to me by Prison staff on the evening of 7th March, it was opened by Prison staff in front of me and the papers given to me, the notebook page was obviously removed at the Masterton police station.  It is the fifth of five pages written by Constable Rhymer about the burglary by Murphy, the subject of the current charge of Perverting the Course of Justice.

It is now considered a crime to fail to report child abuse.  Preventing me from contacting Police and IPCA regarding the abuse by Murphy and his associates is therefore a crime.

Murphy demonstrated his violent tendencies when he smashed my door in in February 2009, and again when he threw a rock through my window recently.  He did this because I raised concerns with Police regarding him and his associates in regard to child abuse and violent behaviour.  My "responsible clinicians" are preventing me contacting police, IPCA, etc, to report these violent crimes, child abuse, etc, and saying I am delusional.  I am not.

(signed)
Katherine Raue

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

South End School - Emily Brown, Rod O'Leary and Elaine Scully stuff up again:

I recently received information that another member of staff at the South End School was recently lied about, defamed and sacked in a manner very similar to the manner in which I was sacked.  The manner in which I received this information confirmed that the same serious breaches of privacy, and gossip and lies, are rampant at the South End School.  The Board and staff involved should be sacked.  Elaine Scully was recently found to have said to a young female Maori student "You're a lying little bitch."  The family never even received a written apology!

Here's the letter I received:

Here's the latest emails:
______________________________________________________________
- Sent 1 May 2011 to Ken Wilson, Statutory Manager, C/- South End School Secretary Scully after original email to address provided by Ministry of Education was returned undeliverable:

Hi Ken,


I understand that you are the Statutory Manager appointed to the South End School, and have been asked to write to you regarding issues around the management and administration of the school.

I was recently handed correspondence between the school and [name deleted to protect privacy], regarding the termination of his employment at the school, which seems to mirror the way I was treated (attached).  I've also been contacted by a number of people who have also complained about the school, including the family of a young girl who was called a "lying little bitch" - as in "You're nothing but a lying little bitch" by Elaine Scully, who is also responsible for this confidential correspondence ending up in my hands and the hands of a number of other people.  Many people said that Mrs Scully, Mr O'Leary, Ms Powell and other staff and members of the Board of Trustees have been spreading rumours throughout the community that I am a child abuser, and that [name deleted to protect privacy] is also a paedophile.

I received a letter from the Board of Trustees which is attached.  Also attached is a note of thanks I received at the end of the year (2008).  The last paragraph of the letter to me, and the thank you note, make a mockery of the school's current position on the matter, and of the Court proceedings brought against me by Rod O'Leary and the former groundsman Thomas Smith.

I've also received copies of correspondence between the school and the Armstrong family about me, which frankly disgust me because they contain nasty and untrue accusations.  Furthermore, Board of Trustees member Emily Brown came to the Armstrong's home and made a number of derogatory statements about me and about how Emily had contacted Police and mental health authorities about me after I politely requested that she arrange a meeting between and the Board about this correspondence I had received containing the untrue allegation that I was a danger to the children.  Emily Brown is an adulterous liar, who has acknowledged (and boasted about) the fact that she was having it off with George Smith while still married to and living with her husband.  Emily's mother and brother committed suicide, and it disgusts many people in the community that she is going around to homes like the Armstrongs, spreading her nasty spiteful UNTRUE rumours, and causing hatred and division in the community.  She claimed to be representing the Board on this visit, which disgusted us even more.  She should resign from the Board immediately, her adultery and lies disgusts decent people in the community.  

I request the immediate return of everything I brought to the school, including the large sign, tools, hoses, plants, etc.

I request that the school write immediately to [name deleted to protect privacy] and apologise to him for distributing his correspondence and breaching his privacy.  He deserves the job as groundsman for all his voluntary work for the school!  The way the Board treats volunteers is disgraceful!

I request that you inform me immediately: 
(1) specifically what information (referred to in the correspondence) the school received about me that led them to believe I was (or "could have been") a danger to the children, and 
(2) from whom specifically the Board (or O'Leary) received this information.

The correspondence to the Armstrongs is outrageous, the two letters to them clearly contain allegations that I am a danger to the kids, O'Leary knows perfectly well that I never told him any such thing, and that there was no meeting until AFTER I received the letter sacking me, ex Deputy Principal Dallas Powell knows this too. They know perfectly well that the local corrupt police officer told him the lies about me being charged, not me, as he is not dishonestly inferring!  The visit to the Armstrong's by Emily Brown was equally outrageous and she should resign immediately because of that alone - how dare she go around the community breaching my privacy and spreading lies like this!!!?  How unprofessional!  I requested a meeting with the Board!

I request an immediate meeting with the Board to discuss the letter which I received from Gavin Kennedy. The last paragraph promises me my job back if I am "acquitted of the charges withdrawn" - there never were any charges as everyone knows, and I want my job back without further delay.

I understand you were appointed on 1 October 2010.  How is it then that [name deleted to protect privacy] was hired and fired by Rod O'Leary and the Board?

I look forward to your urgent response.


--
Kate Raue
Transparency in New Zealand
Friends of Caring Communities

_________________________________________________________________

Hi Ken
We have had the attached email in from Kate. 


I spoke with Emily yesterday to try and ascertain how she got the attached letters.  Emily is sure she has stolen them from her letterbox.  Unfortunately for us, Emily has admitted that she often doesn’t clear her letterbox (which is on the main street) for days at a time. 

I have not responsible for this info getting into Kate’s hands as she states.  I phone Emily or leave a message on her answerphone every time I drop mail into her letterbox.  The only other way I give her board info is to hand it to her son Zac and ask him to take it home (this is usually non important info).

We have phoned the Police and asked them to come down to track this for us.

Any advice?  Do you want me to inform all the board members about what is happening?  Ray was in the office this morning so I have informed him.

Cheers
Elaine.
__________________________________________________________________

Sent this morning, 3 March 2011, after I read this outrageous rubbish:


How dare you?  I don't steal anything!  And have witnesses lined up who handed me the letters and who will confirm that YOU Elaine are the one who stuffed up, AGAIN.  And flinging nasty defamatory lies around AGAIN too.

I'm sick of your lies and accusations, I demand an immediate apology.

Ken, get rid of Elaine Scully and Emily Brown right now, like I said, I've got witnesses lined up.
Katherine Raue

Emily Brown should resign from the Board immediately, she is liar, who stuffs up everything  she is involved in, her husband is far more suited to the position - shame Emily cheated on him with George Smith then left him, shame on Emily!  I didn't steal her mail and I am sick of her nasty lies to try and cover up her own incompetence and spite.

I don't mean to sound so cross, but I am cross, because of the blatant orchestrated litany of lies about the matter.  Such as the document below.  The fact is, that I never went back to the school after I received the letter above.  This charge was because the lying Principal Rod O'Leary made up the story that I told him I'd recently been charged by Police with an offence
 involving a child - why would I???

There was categorically NO bad behaviour, in front of the pupils or at any other time, evidenced by the last paragraph of the letter to me above.  Which is why Police didn't turn up to Court on the day of the hearing, because O'Leary would have been guilty of PERJURY if he had tried to give this evidence:
Efforts to sever ties turned hostile, yes, out of the blue, for no reason, I received the letter above, and suddenly the Board turned very hostile, expecially Emily Brown , who has really lost the plot now, alleging that I stole mail from her letterbox - the woman is absolutely delusional! - someone should contact the mental health services and the police, like she did when I asked for a meeting with the Board!  She should resign from the school Board immediately.  Parents should seek the nomination of her ex husband Graham to take her place on the Board, he is infinitely more suited to it.

Oh, and the language alleged?  According to the only evidence there is, it is alleged that I called the Principal and groundsman thieving crooks.  This is how your taxes are being spent folks.

What's worse than that, is that this is who's teaching your children!

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Corrupt Wairarapa Police Pervert the Course of Justice to Protect Violent Criminals:

This is the  recording of the call to 111 by a woman who saw a car driven by Michael Francis Murphy skid into my driveway on 11 February 2009, and saw him and another person proceed to smash their way into my house and violently attack me.  I've deleted her details to protect her privacy.  She had a birds eye view and saw the entire incident.

This is the link to the Offence Report written up by corrupt Constable Peter Cletus CUNNINGham - after reading the first five pages or so you are thinking "Is this the same incident or what?????"

Here's the link to the statement made by two other woman, Clair Cook and Kelly Wilson, who were walking up the road with a dog, who also witnessed the attack and were so concerned about it that they immediately rang 111 also, and one intervened with the dog to try and stop the attack.  I won't protect her privacy because she refused permission for me to access the audiotape of her call, and is now saying I should "move on", after the local corrupt police officers had a little word in their ear, like they had a little word in the ear of the Board of Trustees of the South End School, when they told them recently that they had charged me with "an offence involving a child", in accordance with their policy of flaunting the very laws they're paid to enforce.

This is the statement made by Michael Murphy to Police the following day.  What sort of a police officer writes rubbish like this you may well ask?  Constable Peter Cletus Cunningham, one of the many corrupt members of the tax payer funded, politically motivated bullying Gestapo police officers who abound in the Wairarapa.

Here's his Statement and his Brief of Evidence (hopefully, uploading these blind as usual, fingers crossed), both dated 1 May.

Now, here's where it gets interesting.  After corrupt Constable CUNNINGham wrote that ridiculous orchstrated litany of lies called an Offence Report referred to above, in which he tries to make out that the victim of a violent home invasion is in fact the criminal offender in the matter (which is what he and his mate Constable Harvey Pope told the Board of Trustees of the South End School), I acquired a disk with audio recordings of 46 police radio tracks, including the one from the anonymous woman.  All of my many, many requests for the tape of the other one, the one from Clair Cook and Kelly Wilson have been refused, and the reason for that I believe is that Murphy's screamed threats ("Get out of the way and I'll smash the fucking door down", etc) were clearly audible in the background.

When police realised I had the recording of the other call, which I had not known existed until I acquired the disk (unlike the one from the other women, which I had seen and heard as it continued after the offenders left), it appears that they had a word to Michael Murphy, who came to my house yet again (his statement refers to earlier visits, with drunken lout Gary McPhee and the cops, abusive text messages, etc) to steal the disk and thereby get rid of the indisputable evidence of his attack, which the police were refusing to investigate and instead making up lies about a non existent incident in the supermarket, an incident which never happened and which there is no evidence of, a pack of malicious lies cooked up by local trouble maker Tracy Feast, because of her obsessive jealousy.

I came home and caught Murphy in the act of stealing the disk (which I had already copied) and two boys from over the road also saw him, at exactly the same time I did, within a few yards of my property, and reported this to the Police.  Constable Laura Rhymer to be exact.  Constable Rhymer recorded my statement in her notebook at 18:30 hours on 8th April 2009.

Constable Rhymer then alleges that she took a statement from Aaron Ronald Brook at 20:50 hours on 8th April 2009.  This is a lie.  This statement did not exist, which is why it's written on blank A4 paper and not in her notebook.  Here's more on Constable Laura Rhymer, and more on Aaron Ronald Brook.

I was later charged with Perverting the Course of Justice and Escaping from Custody, two charges joined as part of a single indictment by Judge Behrens.  There has never been any credible evidence that I did anything wrong whatsoever.  The Escaping from Custody charge was dismissed, during the hearing of a Crown application under s 344A of the Crimes Act by Judge Barry on 30 September 2010, under s 347.

Here's the link to Aaron Brook's Statement, and his Brief of Evidence.  Harder to locate is the original statement of Aaron Brook, which was only produced by Constable Rhymer for the first time half way through the Depositions hearing - it should have been provided with the Disclosure!  I am still trying to locate it, this post will be developed as the documents are uploaded, check back soon.

Here's Constable Laura Rhymer's notebook entries, here is the list of Disclosure - two copies of it actually - showing that there was only one statement disclosed, not two,and that only 2 pages of notebook entries were.  The notation on the documents is by lawyer Ken Daniels, who also wrote on the actual copies of the 2 pages provided "Are there more pages of this notebook.?"

His notes on the page at left read: "NB the BOE's [Briefs of Evidence] are NOT draft or final deposition statements.  * This is an indictable matter."

An examination of this "evidence" reveals what a corrupt and malicious waste of tax payers money this prosecution is!  It shows beyond any doubt that Aaron Brook has always said that he saw Michael Murphy within yards of my home at the exact same time I had earlier reported the theft happening to Police.  He has never recanted that evidence.  He's been boasting that Gary McPhee is paying him money to lie about me in Court.  Someone is, that's for sure.  He and his cousin came to my home and volunteered the information that they'd seen him at the same time I'd earlier reported with no prompting from me whatsoever, I asked them only to tell the Police what they saw, nothing else.  The Depositions evidence shows that the two Justices of the Peace, Adams and Debney, are corrupt in allowing the matter to proceed - they should have found no case to answer on the basis of the "evidence" - there is none against me!  And there is considerable evidence that I was viciously attacked by Murphy and that his intention was to seriously harm me, and that he has a tendency toward violence, and manipulative and threatening behaviour.

I have no lawyer, just a corrupt amicus curiae, who is conspiring with corrupt Police, Court staff, and Adams and Debney to string the matter out as long as possible so that they can profit from their involvement in the matter for as long as possible.  I face seven years in prison on this corruptly laid charge, while Murphy has never been charged with the attack on me or the theft of the satchel and contents.

I wrote this letter to the IPCA recently, sending copies to local police and local MP John Hayes, who has ignored all correspondence to date:










to"murray.johnston" ,
"kevin.basher" ,
Independent Police Conduct Authority ,
johnhayes.mp@xtra.co.nz,
john.hayes@national.org
date12 November 2010 11:10
subjectInformation at Carterton Police Station - Urgent request, please email a list of what the items are immediately and deliver them to the Post Office without further delay
mailed-bygmail.com

 12 Nov
  1. I have previously requested a list of whatever Police are holding at Carterton Police station.

  2. I have previously requested Police deliver whatever it is to the Carterton Post Office without further delay for me to collect from there.

  3. I have had no response to my formal complaints regarding the assaults by Constables Pope, Dallinger, Wilton, or the refusal of these officers and others to take complaints from me, including the formal complaints about the Community Centre, which havenot been addressed in previous correspondence at all, as you know, and the assault on me at Hodders Road recently, which occurred during a call to police from Wayne Friend's cellphone.

  4. I have had no response to my formal complaints and requests for confirmation of information that Wayne Friend was pulled up by police while driving the same car that Murphy, Greig and Feast were in when they came to Brooklyn Rd on 11th February and smashed my door in and attacked me while horrified witnesses called 111, registration PY 5539 or similar, in Masterton recently and was let off without a ticket in spite of having no registration or warrant.  This is referred to in another letter I wrote you, please provide copies of all letters you have on the file from me, as my papers are in Hodders Rd and police are preventing me accessing them deliberately.

  5. I have had no response to my formal complaints regarding the refusal of Constable Wilton and others to take complaints regarding the damage to my property at Hodders Rd, now called Gallon Road, or the assaults by Wayne Friend and Tim Reynolds.  I showed Wilton the glass in my dressing table drawers, and the smashed tv set etc, and she smiled.  

  6. I have requested all information regarding me, and in particular all information including audio recordings of the phone calls to police from that address in the last twelve months, in particular the lengthy call made by Wayne Friend while Tim Reynolds assaulted me and illegally detained (kidnapped) me.

  7. I repeat my request that this be delivered to the Post Office immediately.

  8. My Court paperwork (and other essential items) is at that address in what is now Gallon Road, after police wrongly insisted I be bailed to there in spite of me pointing out that they had specifically opposed it recently because of the risk of violence against me.  After then forcing me to live there the Police have a duty to take my complaints, provide the evidence to me and charge my attackers.

  9. This was noted in the Wellington Court recently when the residential bail clause was deleted.  

  10. Police have a duty to protect me and charge the people who attacked me.

  11. Police have a proven record of failing in their duty.  There is currently an investigation into the huge number of uninvestigated child abuse allegations in the Wairarapa.

  12. Police have a proven record of refusing to take complaints from victims of violence such as the victims of Gary McPhee's drunken home invasion - this is a FORMAL COMPLAINT into the Wairarapa police for corruption, bias and prejudice and refusing to act with fiduciary responsibility and due diligence.

  13. My own such allegations against Michael Murphy Tracy Feast and Tuakana Greig have never been investigated, like the allegations about the Carterton Community Centre, this is a FORMAL COMPLAINT.

Katherine Raue

Read their response at this link.  It ignores most of the complaint, as usual.  The property at the Police station turned out to be a large box of my own files, Police have refused to reveal how they came to be at the Police station, or where the rest of my files are, this is obviously another attempt to pervert the course of justice as police appear to have gone through the files removing whatever they think doesn't show them in a good light.

Friday, February 18, 2011

Home Invasion - "No Charges To Be Laid":

Regarding this letter from Police Damage Control Manager, "I will try and address the issues as I see them" - not "I will try and look at things from your perspective and address the issues you have raised."
According to his numbered points:
  • Firstly, has there been any response to the two letters sent by Mr Daniels, and the vague allegation that "these matters have been addressed in previous correspondence . . . . . and I do not intend to revisit them."  This is utter rubbish, Tara Sewell of the Police lied and wrote a letter dated 30 May 2008 stating this (my comments in italics):
1. “All information regarding police file 010518/2481’

There is no file with that number held by Police therefore your request for information is refused pursuant to section 29(2)(b) of the Privacy Act 1993 as the information does not exist.  The file is the subject of the letter to lawyer Kamil Lakshman of Ainslie Hewton from Sgt GN Reid of Masterton Police
 
2. “All information regarding a complaint of theft by the same group of people against myself and Jennifer Armstrong and Oasis Trust regarding a derelict caravan on the site of the former Carterton Community Gardens in Moreton Road”

I am advised by Senior Sergeant Johnston there is no correspondence or documentation held by Police on the theft of the derelict caravan. He further advises that this matter was dealt with at the time on the telephone. Your request for this information is refused pursuant to section 29(2)(b) of the Privacy Act 1 993 as the information does not exist.  What rubbish - there was a pile of paperwork on this one!  Links will be up soon, watch this space, this is a really good one!  Police wasted a whole lot of time over this complaint against me and Jennifer Armstrong, when the complainants had no authority whatsoever to make any complaints at all, and lied in telling everyone they had been authorised.  And, this was 6 months after they'd signed ownership over to us anyway!

3. “All information regarding the complaints relating to the illegal takeover, fraud, theft of mall and theft of all assets of the former Community Centre”

Police currently have insufficient information to locate the information that you have requested. Police will require more information from you in order to locate the information.

Please provide Police with details such as the date(s) of the above mentioned incidents, the approximate time(s) of the incidents, any Police staff involved and what specific information you require from Police.

Police will consider and process your request for information once further details are received.  This was, inter alia, the subject of the letters from Ken Daniels and the other lawyers.

4. “AII information regarding the phone calls made to the police by Larry Mason (through 111 emergency services I believe), Rachel Betteridge and Ewen Hyde (either 111 or directly to Masterton Police station), including all transcripts and audio recordings, job sheets, etc regarding the complaints made against me to the police by these people”

Police currently have insufficient information to locate the information that you have requested. Police will require more information from you in order to locate the information.

Please provide Police with details such as the approximate date(s) of the above mentioned phone calls, the approximate time(s) of the phone calls and any further information that you think will help Police in the search for information about the phone calls. - This was the subject, inter alia, of the two letters sent by Ken Daniels referred to above, and a large amount of other correspondence.

5. “Any information that any attempt whatsoever was made by police to obtain any evidence of Rachel Betteridge’s claims.”  The second page of the letter claims that "this information doesn't exist."  No, because Police never even looked at her phone let alone contacted Vodafone, to verify Betteridge's outrageous lies.  I challenge them to do so, and to address the signed statements from the JP's, seeking sworn statements from them both.  Links to these matters will be up soon, in the meantime, search the site for them.







There was more than a "verbal exchange" - there was a violent and unprovoked attack by two huge, drunken bikies, on tiny little sick people and women.  This article above us pure political propaganda of the Adolf Hitler School.  "The flat had been the centre of police inquiries" indeed.  Yes, like my house was the "centre of police inquiries after the violent attack on me on 11th February 2009.  "I want people to feel safe" indeed!  So I bash people's doors in and assault them for no reason.  Yeah, right.

Gary McPhee and Ron Mark are posers.  Read these two articles, and the other information on this site, and marvel at the mentality of people who voted for this nit wit.
It doesn't take 20 years to do something about violence - unless you spend your time like this, posing for pictures and getting 'touched up' (by 'artists').  Check out the silly little baseball hat for goodness sake.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Wairarapa Police Pervert the Course of Justice Again


Here's the letter from Senior Sergeant Johnston, corruptly trying to cover up a vicious, violent, planned home invasion and assault with a weapon.

Here is the link to one of several phone calls to emergency services while the attack was taking place, from witnesses, first hand. This is a blatantly corrupt cover up of a vicious violent home invasion orchestrated by Michael Francis Murphy and Tracy Feast. This is evidence of blatant police corruption, and it's why Sgt Johnston doesn't work at the Masterton Police station any more apparently.





The letter below refers firstly to some of the letters written by lawyer Ken Daniels to the police. Follow the link to read two of the many letters sent by lawyers to the police, and Sgt Murray Johnston's rude and arrogant email dismissal of our complaints. The complaints have been corruptly ignored in spite of monumental evidence of fraud and gross misfeasance.

Secondly, the letter contains the refusal of the police to charge local prostitute Rachel Betteridge with Perjury, or anything else, after Betteridge and her husband sent me text messages, saying "You need a bullet" and "Watch your back" among other extremely offensive and threatening messages. Police have been provided with signed statements from two Justices of the Peace, and a considerable amount of other information, in support of my complaints regarding this lying prostitute. We'll come back to this matter in a minute.

Thirdly, the letter refers to the nasty drunken home invasion and assault committed by corruptly 'elected' Mayor Gary McPhee, and the refusal of the police to charge him or his co-offender. "The matter was investigated at the time and no charges were to be laid." - Oh really? WHY NOT? - This sounds like another PITIFUL EXCUSE used by the police to let criminals off: "I am aware that the Carterton District Council Members, the Carterton Mayor and MP Georgina Beyer have recently discussed issues around the closing of the centre. In such circumstances the actions of the 'elected' officers of the centre are most unlikely to have breached any Criminal Law."

A number of lawyers have written letters referring to the indisputable evidence that it most certainly IS fraud!

Fourthly, the letter refers to the Bill Sticking charges laid against me by Constable Cunningham in about 2003, and the fact that the prosecution was so zealously pursued although there was absolutely
no evidence whatsoever to support the police wasting their time on it right from the beginning. Like the lies of Rachel Betteridge.


Like the trespass matters, all politically motivated corruption.
Read full story:

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Pope Loses the Plot:

This is the huge rock which was thrown through my window while I slept, innocently minding my own business as usual, at about 20 past one in the morning.

If this rock had hit my head, I would probably be dead.

Constable Harvey Pope, of the Carterton Police, is apparently in charge of "investigating" the matter.

Instead of doing so, he abused his position, and used it to pervert the course of justice, as usual.

The previous post has a link to one of the fake Facebook profiles created recently, and a copy of a message from another one, these have been created by Julian Tyerman and Robert Brook and their associates, and Police could easily confirm that if they were so inclined, but they aren't, because they like to cover up violence and protect violent offenders in the Wairarapa.  Here's the hole in the window.  The window was 5mm thick, and the slices of glass were razor sharp.
Here's the link to Constable Harvey Pope's paperwork relating to his "arrest" of me, still waiting for the paperwork about this investigation into the attack - that should be interesting!  To say the least.  We're seeing a pattern here.

This all started when the Police charged me with bill sticking because Constable Peter Cunningham issued me with an illegal trespass notice regarding the Carterton Community Centre, which he later had to apologise for - actually he never did apologise as far as I recall, Sgt Murray Johnston and the Area Commander did.  Cunningham was babbling on about how the notices were defamatory to Georgina Beyer and Councillors and Council staff, everyone tried to tell him defamation was a civil matter, but oh no, Constable Cunningham knew better . . . and now Pope is having hysterics about me writing a blog, when people are assaulting me (see link next paragraph), smashing my possessions

This is an outrageous act of violence.  Like another outrageous act of violence, the attack by Michael Murphy and others on 11 February 2009.  Like this nasty mindless destruction by Wayne Friend and Tim Reynolds:

And here's the highlight of all the paperwork Constable Harvey Pope created when he came and arrested me, promising he was going to send me to prison till March, and this is the highlight of what he presented to the Court, and wasted all day, and probably all of the few days prior to this, doing, instead of  investigating all the child abuse allegations the local police ignore as a matter of course.  Oh, and giving me bike helmet tickets all the time.  No wonder crime is out of hand in the Wairarapa, the cops have lost the plot.  They spend their time perpetrating politically motivated corruption, in order to keep their mates, Georgina Bayer and Gary McPhee in positions of power.

Constable Harvey Pope is the spitting image of disgraced Deputy Commissioner Rob Pope, who was recently told not to bother reapplying for his job.  Harvey Pope only got the job because he's related to Rob Pope - nepotism was one of Dame Margaret Bazely's main criticisms in her recent report, which was utterly damning of the NZ Police.  Harvey Pope has failed to be promoted above the rank of Constable because of his incompetence and corruption.

He spends all day persecuting the victims of violent crime and making up long involved excuses for the recidivist violent offenders, like his mates in the Wairarapa Police, and the NZ Police in general.

This post will be updated daily with more information about Pope's corruption.  The public need to be warned about creeps like Alan Donoghue and Wayne Friend, and instead, Harvey Pope is worried about me defaming them?  The sooner Pope is sacked the better for the NZ Police and the Wairarapa.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

More hatred and vandalism condoned by corrupt Wairarapa Police:

This fake facebook profile was created in the last couple of weeks, and these threats were made on it.  It's the second time these people have created fake Facebook pages.  Police could forensically trace who made these pages very easily, if they were so inclined, unfortunately, they support this behaviour and encourage it and protect the offenders.

On Monday, several local people came to alert me to the graffiti, and a large number of posters stuck up around the town, pushed under shop doors, etc, which contained spiteful and defamatory statements about me.  Many of them said they'd taken the posters to the police station and complained, and that Carterton Police told them that they had spoken to me (named in the posters) which was an utter lie because they refused to speak to me about it, smirking and laughing instead.  I rang the Masterton station and the Police Communication Centre, because the calls are recorded.

I spent hours at the Masterton Police station on Tuesday, trying to make a complaint about this graffiti, and the facebook page (identity theft, and the threats), the theft and vandalism of my property by Rachel Taylor, Wayne Friend etc, among other things.  The officer who came to the counter wrote down about four words on a bit of paper, disappeared for ages , then came back and said they wouldn't be taking my complaints because "they're already being dealt with."  I wanted to make a statement or statements about the complaints, and as usual, corrupt Wairarapa Police refused to take statements, or even acknowledge the complaints.

This is the standard lie from the local police, the exact same lie which has been trotted out since our complaints about the illegal activities at the former Carterton Community Centre involving Georgina Beyer the Liar and the people associated with the Carterton District Council.  One of the more bare faced examples of this is the letter from corrupt and overpaid Tara Sewell of the legal section at Police headquarters.

Police spent a considerable amount of taxpayers money when they charged me with Billsticking (in about 2003) for putting up notices in Carterton advertising a public meeting to discuss the illegal takeover, mismanagement and closure of the Carterton Community Centre.  The excuse given initially (in writing) by the Police for proceeding with the prosecution, which they were later forced to apologise for, was that the notices were defamatory (against Georgina Beyer and members of the Carterton District Council).  Defamation is a civil matter and nothing whatsoever to do with the Police.  Wairarapa Police are ignoring child abuse allegations and focusing their attention on persecuting law abiding people like me, who seek to rid the Wairarapa of the shameful crime, child abuse and suicide which has characterised the area for decades.  The only evidence to support the Billsticking charges was that my fingerprints were allegedly on the notice, but I was acquitted when the Police had no evidence to offer at the trial, because they knew full well that the fingerprints only meant that I had touched the notice in question, and not that I had put it on the building in question on the date in question, which was the Community Centre building.  As I was the Secretary and Treasurer of the Community Centre, it's no wonder Police didn't turn up in Court, because as usual, no crime had been committed.
Compare this with the indisputable evidence of my complaints which are ignored every time.

I asked the Police to ensure that they fingerprinted the notices stuck around the town on Sunday night, these notices were completely different to the notices I am alleged to have stuck up advertising the public meeting, they are extremely nasty, hate filled, offensive, and most certainly defamatory, unlike the ones I put up.  Let's see if Police do, or whether they get rid of the evidence as usual.  There were a large number of the notices given to Police, including several which had been carefully picked up to preserve the prints.  Many were stuck up in view of the security CCTV cameras, I requested the footage first thing Monday morning, let's see if we get it.

Yesterday, corrupt local constable Harvey Pope, who is the spitting image of disgraced Police Deputy Commissioner Rob Pope, recently told not to bother reapplying for his job, arrested me for alleged bail breaches.  I was locked in a cell for most of the day, which Police typed up reams of paper full of excuses why they opposed my bail and tried their utmost to have me imprisoned.  The alleged bail breaches involved me and a friend asking for my property back, including the keyboard which was smashed after I went and asked for it back, from where it was locked in the house occupied by local methamphetamine dealer Wayne Friend and Tim Reynolds.  Police, who have twice assisted their mates to move house while on duty, have refused to assist me at all regarding this matter.  I was living at the address and was assaulted by my partner, the tape of the call to Police during an assault on me at the property after I was invited by Reynold to come and see what Wayne Friend's P addict mate had stolen, is on this site and is clearly evidence of an assault and kidnapping of me.  Harvey Pope wasted hundreds if not thousands of dollars of Police resources trying to corruptly lock me up, but Judge Tuohy wouldn't even let them read out their corrupt little story in the Court and released me.

Last night a huge rock was thrown through my window.  If it had hit my head, I would be dead.  Police are refusing to do anything about any of it, like the other complaints, and the new Area Commander refused to make an appointment with me when I rang him this morning.

We need an urgent inquiry into this Police corruption in the Wairarapa, and NZ in general, one that involves the investigators acknowledging the complaints made by me which have been ignored, and then investigating them.  The complaints about the Community Centre were fobbed off with the excuse that they had been "addressed in previous correspondence" which is nothing more than a pack of blatant lies, when we requested the file on the complaint Police wrote back and said the file doesn't exist - of course it doesn't, because the complaints were corruptly ignored.

 

This is a photo of the creep who complained to Harvey Pope that I was harassing him, Alan Donoghue, who sexually assaulted me last year and has conspired with corrupt Constable Pope - no wonder he's still a Constable! - to cook up a pack of lies alleging that I assaulted him.  Donoghue spent years in prison for armed and aggravated robbery, he is a criminal, who spends his taxpayer funded benefit on drugs and alcohol and spends his days drinking and taking drugs.  Corrupt local Police are refusing to take my complaint about Donoghue's assault on me and charging me instead.  Donoghue's statements go on about how he feels he is a "victim", and he's scared of me and feels intimidated, etc, but Police are ignoring the fact that he and his mates are the ones harassing me.  They came to the address I'm staying at, where the rock was thrown through the window, making a nuisance of themselves after he alleged he felt scared of me - there was no reason for him to come there whatsoever, and if it were true that he feels scared and intimidated, why has he approached me about five times since the charge was laid to abuse and threaten me in front of witnesses?!  He and his mate Darren Hughes (another low life druggie criminal, unemployed, like Donoghue, were caught interfering with my bicycle on another recent occasion and he approached me when I was talking to a person outside the supermarket, witnesses have noted his menacing and unpleasant attitude and demeanor, and Police refuse to issue him with a Harassment notice.  Here he is in the bottle store, stocking up on supplies for the day.
Allan Donoghue, guilty of sexual assault and making a false complaint to Police.
Harvey Pope's whole excuse for locking me up was because Alan Donoghue had complained that I took a photo of him and Constable Pope said I should be locked up to stop me putting information on the internet about people.  Unbelievable.  Constable Pope is like Constable Cunningham, who started all this in the first place, by charging me with Billsticking after trying to arrest me (her read me my rights for heavens sake - and it's one of the few times local police have done so too!) for defamation.  After I told defamation was a civil matter and he wasn't allowed to arrest me for it, he went away, and a little while later I got a summons for Billsticking.  His friends were stealing money hand over fist from the Carterton Community Centre, stealing funds that had been granted to assist the less well off in the community.  They closed down the Carterton Community Centre and stole every bit of money in the ten bank accounts, after saying they were going to give any left over to the IHC on the application to wind up the Centre, they never did, they stole every single cent from the ten organisations "under its umbrella".  This grand Event Centre is just another reincarnation of the trough for the pigs to feed from that was the Carterton Community Centre, because it's run by the same people and their mates, rich lawyers who have hidden agendas, and greedy artists who have figured out how to get plenty of funding for so called community projects.  Sean Crawford received a grant of $1000 just for "having an exhibition" for two weeks at Prime Gallery, a free gallery, as in free to have an exhibition, while we got just $250 from the same people to run the Community Gardens for a whole year.  It was a darn sight harder doing that than Sean Crawford's effort - described by him as "kicking stones".  His work consists mainly of tortured animals, weapons, snarling dogs made of razor wire, and other sharp metal, gun and bomb imagery, etc.  We helped people to establish vegetable gardens and fruit trees, we established gardens in schools, like the South End School.  We got everyone doing their community hours sooner or later too, and trained people in good work habits, and good life habits.  We got them off the streets and into jobs, and rehabilitation programs, etc, and just helped to bring out the best in everyone.  It was a great garden, and a great community centre and we need an inquiry into the manner in which it was taken over and mismanaged and defrauded by the very people behind this Event Centre, opposed by two petitions, the very same people who are still on the Council after years of this corruption and fraud.